Russian Journal of Marine Biology

Russian Journal of Marine Biology is a journal that covers a wide range of research and some applied aspects of marine biology as a synthetic science related to various fields of study on marine biota and environment. It presents fundamental research on biological processes at molecular, cellular, organismal, and populational levels in marine organisms. Consideration is given to marine objects as models in life sciences.PEER REVIEWRussian Journal of Marine Biology is a peer reviewed journal. We use a double blind peer review format. Our team of reviewers includes over 300 reviewers, both internal and external (97%). The average period from submission to first decision in 2017 was 5 days, and that from first decision to acceptance was 30 days. The rejection rate for submitted manuscripts in 2017 was 35%. The final decision on the acceptance of an article for publication is made by the Editorial Board.Any invited reviewer who feels unqualified or unable to review the manuscript due to the conflict of interests should promptly notify the editors and decline the invitation. Reviewers should formulate their statements clearly in a sound and reasoned way so that authors can use reviewer’s arguments to improve the manuscript. Personal criticism of the authors must be avoided. Reviewers should indicate in a review (i) any relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors, (ii) anything that has been reported in previous publications and not given appropriate reference or citation, (ii) any substantial similarity or overlap with any other manuscript (published or unpublished) of which they have personal knowledge.

Russian Journal of Marine Biology期刊中文简介

《俄罗斯海洋生物学杂志》是一份涵盖海洋生物学的广泛研究和一些应用方面的期刊，是一门综合性科学，涉及海洋生物群落和环境的各个研究领域。它介绍了在分子、细胞、有机体和种群水平上的海洋生物过程的基础研究。考虑到海洋物体作为生命科学的模型。同行评审《俄罗斯海洋生物学杂志》是一份同行评议的期刊。我们使用双盲同行评审格式。我们的审稿人团队包括超过300名审稿人，包括内部审稿人和外部审稿人(97%)。2017年从提交到首次评审的平均周期为5天，从首次评审到验收的平均周期为30天。2017年投稿退稿率为35%。接受发表文章的最终决定由编辑委员会作出。被邀请的审稿人因利益冲突，认为不符合审稿条件或者不能审稿的，应当及时通知审稿人，并予以拒绝。审稿人应以一种合理合理的方式清晰地阐述自己的观点，这样作者才能利用审稿人的观点来完善稿件。必须避免对作者的个人批评。评论者应该显示发表的一篇评论(我)任何相关的工作没有被引用的作者,(2)任何已报道在以前的出版物和没有适当的参考或引用,(2)任何实质性相似或重叠与其他手稿(发表或未发表)的个人知识。